Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-01 20:06:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN.. Segundo a própria matéria anexada pelo autor acima, O (STF) definiu que é válida a abertura de encomenda postada nos Correios por funcionários da empresa, desde que haja indícios fundamentados da prática de atividade ilícita. Não precisa de nota. https://www.portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=521095&ori=1

Written by A923820FC7F352B7C1B4056175C40E52940E3301616026145E4DD0CC09FA2EDC
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1730596884211810475

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1730679749549138303
  • noteId - 1730679749549138303
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A923820FC7F352B7C1B4056175C40E52940E3301616026145E4DD0CC09FA2EDC Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701461181426
  • tweetId - 1730596884211810475
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN.. Segundo a própria matéria anexada pelo autor acima, O (STF) definiu que é válida a abertura de encomenda postada nos Correios por funcionários da empresa, desde que haja indícios fundamentados da prática de atividade ilícita. Não precisa de nota. https://www.portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=521095&ori=1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-01 20:06:21 UTC
(1701461181426)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-02 04:36:39 UTC
(1701491799670)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-01 18:59:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 18:15:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 17:21:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 02:30:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 02:28:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 18:59:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 17:11:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 17:10:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 16:52:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 12:53:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 06:21:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 05:30:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 05:11:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 22:51:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 21:08:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 19:56:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 07:55:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 07:42:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-01 16:26:53 -0600 Rating Details