Birdwatch Note
2023-11-29 22:53:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Oddly this doesn't appear to be a scam link. It's an actual news story. No idea why it's got the scam headline.
Written by 55CACB6A7C6AF1BE790B157A33650A116A77CFE71F9C511BB28A37357BD3A368
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1727336023498043546
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729996954619306096
- noteId - 1729996954619306096
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 55CACB6A7C6AF1BE790B157A33650A116A77CFE71F9C511BB28A37357BD3A368 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701298390427
- tweetId - 1727336023498043546
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Oddly this doesn't appear to be a scam link. It's an actual news story. No idea why it's got the scam headline.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-29 22:53:10 UTC (1701298390427) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-30 03:24:52 UTC (1701314692069) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-29 17:12:23 -0600 | Rating Details |