Birdwatch Note
2023-11-29 19:25:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
CO2 is not regarded as a toxic pollutant and this has never been a part of the scientific case for reducing our emissions. Although the proportion of atmospheric CO2 is small, its effect on climate is well understood and backed up by an overwhelming scientific consensus. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/basics-of-climate-change/ https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
Written by F6700CE6C398D88F68989BD0B4936602C790E4F7DAA7C6B0AB49AE53BD11CCC4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729659980343607558
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729944623617814580
- noteId - 1729944623617814580
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F6700CE6C398D88F68989BD0B4936602C790E4F7DAA7C6B0AB49AE53BD11CCC4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701285913744
- tweetId - 1729659980343607558
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- CO2 is not regarded as a toxic pollutant and this has never been a part of the scientific case for reducing our emissions. Although the proportion of atmospheric CO2 is small, its effect on climate is well understood and backed up by an overwhelming scientific consensus. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/basics-of-climate-change/ https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-29 19:25:13 UTC (1701285913744) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-30 03:24:52 UTC (1701314692069) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-29 17:24:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 15:36:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 14:39:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 14:37:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 14:36:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 13:40:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 13:34:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 05:04:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 02:30:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 02:14:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 01:26:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 20:32:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 20:03:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 19:22:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 17:21:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 16:49:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 16:19:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 15:44:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 14:37:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 13:54:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 13:49:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 15:58:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 13:21:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 22:02:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-01 10:08:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 20:12:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 17:53:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 15:03:49 -0600 | Rating Details |