Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-29 14:51:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

La décision est rendu par 12 parlementaires et 3 magistrats de la cour de cassation. Celle-ci se base sur des éléments purement judiciaires d'intentionalités vérifiés, non reconnu dans ce cas précis par absence de volonté manifeste , malgré la validité d'une prise d'intérêt. https://www.vie-publique.fr/eclairage/19542-la-cour-de-justice-de-la-republique-une-institution-contestee https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/live/2023/11/29/proces-dupond-moretti-en-direct-la-decision-de-la-cour-de-justice-de-la-republique-attendue-a-15-heures_6202963_3224.html

Written by 1F5B3E7B66F720D1AD1008A425C92150B3386C51B65833BAB8A8CCD01AF02741
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729869258233205120

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1729875857492361422
  • noteId - 1729875857492361422
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1F5B3E7B66F720D1AD1008A425C92150B3386C51B65833BAB8A8CCD01AF02741 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701269518624
  • tweetId - 1729869258233205120
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • La décision est rendu par 12 parlementaires et 3 magistrats de la cour de cassation. Celle-ci se base sur des éléments purement judiciaires d'intentionalités vérifiés, non reconnu dans ce cas précis par absence de volonté manifeste , malgré la validité d'une prise d'intérêt. https://www.vie-publique.fr/eclairage/19542-la-cour-de-justice-de-la-republique-une-institution-contestee https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/live/2023/11/29/proces-dupond-moretti-en-direct-la-decision-de-la-cour-de-justice-de-la-republique-attendue-a-15-heures_6202963_3224.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-29 14:51:58 UTC
(1701269518624)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-30 03:24:52 UTC
(1701314692069)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-29 11:19:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 10:46:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:50:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:41:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 14:21:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 13:10:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 11:15:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 10:00:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:47:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:34:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:31:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 09:02:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-30 03:53:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-30 01:34:03 -0600 Rating Details