Birdwatch Note
2023-11-28 17:20:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
England has contempt of court laws which cover social media. In the interests of justice & a fair trial, people should refrain from analysing this case either in original tweets or in community notes until the case is concluded. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60d4a59dd3bf7f7c3716c60d/Contempt_of_court_-_fact_sheet.pdf
Written by 85678BD794A189B7B55C5DDC79C04AD911FF878B58323E217DB43FAD63534280
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729358075008889326
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729550736684392776
- noteId - 1729550736684392776
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 85678BD794A189B7B55C5DDC79C04AD911FF878B58323E217DB43FAD63534280 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701192003782
- tweetId - 1729358075008889326
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- England has contempt of court laws which cover social media. In the interests of justice & a fair trial, people should refrain from analysing this case either in original tweets or in community notes until the case is concluded. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60d4a59dd3bf7f7c3716c60d/Contempt_of_court_-_fact_sheet.pdf
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-28 17:20:03 UTC (1701192003782) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-29 04:14:16 UTC (1701231256233) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-28 13:05:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:53:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:29:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:26:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 07:37:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 01:02:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 23:11:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-30 11:08:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-30 02:59:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 06:28:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 05:47:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-29 05:00:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 18:14:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 18:03:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 13:31:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 12:10:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:50:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:45:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-28 11:38:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-30 19:09:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-30 02:50:04 -0600 | Rating Details |