Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-28 10:29:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is currently no credible evidence to support the claim that Prince William sent Jason Kanuf to be a witness in Harry's court case. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11544049/Sussexes-former-PR-chief-rejects-claims-gave-evidence-against-Meghan-behest-Prince-William.html

Written by 50160921DD9C43A0612C584A413FC064AD518D1975D89310AFBCBA1C1964B580
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729264669804654611

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1729447442398011497
  • noteId - 1729447442398011497
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 50160921DD9C43A0612C584A413FC064AD518D1975D89310AFBCBA1C1964B580 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701167376502
  • tweetId - 1729264669804654611
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is currently no credible evidence to support the claim that Prince William sent Jason Kanuf to be a witness in Harry's court case. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11544049/Sussexes-former-PR-chief-rejects-claims-gave-evidence-against-Meghan-behest-Prince-William.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-28 10:29:36 UTC
(1701167376502)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-29 04:14:16 UTC
(1701231256233)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-28 05:18:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 20:03:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 05:05:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-06-16 01:57:51 -0500 Rating Details