Birdwatch Note
2023-11-28 09:28:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Shibli tried to ban certain statements made by a newspaper critique of her book. One of the statements she wanted to ban was "committed BDS activist". The court ruled that the statements were protected by the freedom of speech in in favor of the TAZ Newspaper. https://taz.de/Gericht-schuetzt-Literaturkritik/!5972478/ https://taz.de/Debatte-um-Autorin-Adania-Shibli/!5965811/ https://www.boersenblatt.net/home/verbotsantrag-von-adania-shibli-gegen-die-taz-gescheitert-310883
Written by A30C704F12BB344CA8D78C591CC505B5051659A3DDFCFA7E5EC82D9B58119C02
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729276215490396548
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729432053823803831
- noteId - 1729432053823803831
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A30C704F12BB344CA8D78C591CC505B5051659A3DDFCFA7E5EC82D9B58119C02 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701163707580
- tweetId - 1729276215490396548
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Shibli tried to ban certain statements made by a newspaper critique of her book. One of the statements she wanted to ban was "committed BDS activist". The court ruled that the statements were protected by the freedom of speech in in favor of the TAZ Newspaper. https://taz.de/Gericht-schuetzt-Literaturkritik/!5972478/ https://taz.de/Debatte-um-Autorin-Adania-Shibli/!5965811/ https://www.boersenblatt.net/home/verbotsantrag-von-adania-shibli-gegen-die-taz-gescheitert-310883
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-28 09:28:27 UTC (1701163707580) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-29 04:14:16 UTC (1701231256233) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-28 16:33:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 11:44:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 04:31:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 14:20:47 -0600 | Rating Details |