Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-28 02:27:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

On the second drive of the game, Michigan was in a 6 man box on a run play by Ohio State. This contradicts the claim that Michigan had a 100% success rate at guessing run vs. pass in the first quarter and countering with a sellout formation. https://x.com/jstierle04/status/1729269505812226118

Written by F2BCC6C60FDD8CAF901E652FE6D8157DD3BDAD65F623A366EF63DED890F487D5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729225185490800684

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1729326070787444930
  • noteId - 1729326070787444930
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F2BCC6C60FDD8CAF901E652FE6D8157DD3BDAD65F623A366EF63DED890F487D5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701138439258
  • tweetId - 1729225185490800684
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • On the second drive of the game, Michigan was in a 6 man box on a run play by Ohio State. This contradicts the claim that Michigan had a 100% success rate at guessing run vs. pass in the first quarter and countering with a sellout formation. https://x.com/jstierle04/status/1729269505812226118

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-28 02:27:19 UTC
(1701138439258)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-29 04:14:16 UTC
(1701231256233)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-27 22:33:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 12:57:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 12:06:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-27 20:44:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-27 20:42:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-30 10:15:59 -0600 Rating Details