Birdwatch Note
2023-11-27 14:47:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It would be nigh impossible to determine the purity of a dog breed using image recognition alone, and there is a reason people pay a lot of money for DNA testing to determine dog breed identification. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breeding https://www.amazon.com.au/Embark-Identification-Results-Genetic-Markers/dp/B01EINBA76
Written by 0C00D5331E08300DAFB51EEA2E7132B1020ABE0CBE130C07EA204F6DA00011E9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1705148865870229513
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729150008623308912
- noteId - 1729150008623308912
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0C00D5331E08300DAFB51EEA2E7132B1020ABE0CBE130C07EA204F6DA00011E9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701096462766
- tweetId - 1705148865870229513
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It would be nigh impossible to determine the purity of a dog breed using image recognition alone, and there is a reason people pay a lot of money for DNA testing to determine dog breed identification. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breeding https://www.amazon.com.au/Embark-Identification-Results-Genetic-Markers/dp/B01EINBA76
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-27 14:47:42 UTC (1701096462766) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-28 03:24:11 UTC (1701141851422) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-27 08:57:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 08:52:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 04:23:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 08:19:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 11:08:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 06:21:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 13:59:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-02 04:21:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-01 20:35:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 07:12:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 01:06:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-02 00:12:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 04:00:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-07 17:51:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-07 15:19:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 04:24:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 07:25:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-13 14:05:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-13 02:37:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 02:24:13 -0600 | Rating Details |