Birdwatch Note
2023-11-27 08:04:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This post is misleading. There are already no ‘no go’ areas for Labour in Brighton and Hove. Labour won majority control of the Council in May, the first party to do so for 24 years, and has always stood and campaigned in every part of the city. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Brighton_and_Hove_City_Council_election
Written by 64BD42B72A3C2F1BA89EB62222FF540EE7F4960D4034E1EFD589C5288DE404AB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729036553291493451
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1729048599588131131
- noteId - 1729048599588131131
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 64BD42B72A3C2F1BA89EB62222FF540EE7F4960D4034E1EFD589C5288DE404AB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701072284967
- tweetId - 1729036553291493451
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This post is misleading. There are already no ‘no go’ areas for Labour in Brighton and Hove. Labour won majority control of the Council in May, the first party to do so for 24 years, and has always stood and campaigned in every part of the city. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Brighton_and_Hove_City_Council_election
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-27 08:04:44 UTC (1701072284967) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-28 03:24:11 UTC (1701141851422) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-27 17:06:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 06:17:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 05:50:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 04:11:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 03:39:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 02:56:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 01:12:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-28 00:42:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 13:38:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 08:08:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 05:27:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 04:50:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 04:12:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 03:38:27 -0600 | Rating Details |