Birdwatch Note
2023-11-26 08:50:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The organisation that carried out the study didn't say Christmas should be cancelled, they suggested "We don't have to cancel Christmas altogether, but perhaps it is time to rethink how we celebrate it" in 2022 https://pressroom.journolink.com/watch-this-sp-ce/release/is_it_time_to_cancel_christmas_11887
Written by A286FC4D1071C3AC4A4A286E211C7F67E117AE44239AA994BAED05EF1A4AF768
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1728473835752542361
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1728697804690764001
- noteId - 1728697804690764001
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A286FC4D1071C3AC4A4A286E211C7F67E117AE44239AA994BAED05EF1A4AF768 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700988648946
- tweetId - 1728473835752542361
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The organisation that carried out the study didn't say Christmas should be cancelled, they suggested "We don't have to cancel Christmas altogether, but perhaps it is time to rethink how we celebrate it" in 2022 https://pressroom.journolink.com/watch-this-sp-ce/release/is_it_time_to_cancel_christmas_11887
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-26 08:50:48 UTC (1700988648946) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-27 03:36:51 UTC (1701056211538) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-26 17:51:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 12:06:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 11:16:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 05:58:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 04:32:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 23:03:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 10:13:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 09:59:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 09:34:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 06:25:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 06:13:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 05:23:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 04:21:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 03:30:29 -0600 | Rating Details |