Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-25 23:03:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In relation to COVID-19, scientific studies have proven that 60-75% of cases infect no one but during super-spreading events, 10-20% of infected people are responsible for 80% of the secondary infections. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00406-0/fulltext

Written by AF2F41E72517CC0884647A724D44AB42D8F8FF66BD6D62E05AD88A3233389FAD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1728516698943401991

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1728550125134344548
  • noteId - 1728550125134344548
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AF2F41E72517CC0884647A724D44AB42D8F8FF66BD6D62E05AD88A3233389FAD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700953439394
  • tweetId - 1728516698943401991
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • In relation to COVID-19, scientific studies have proven that 60-75% of cases infect no one but during super-spreading events, 10-20% of infected people are responsible for 80% of the secondary infections. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00406-0/fulltext

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-25 23:03:59 UTC
(1700953439394)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-26 03:30:36 UTC
(1700969436505)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-25 18:32:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:31:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:28:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:26:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:23:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:13:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:03:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:49:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:44:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 09:27:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 08:49:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 21:05:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 20:30:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 19:14:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:54:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 20:28:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 11:11:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 00:56:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 00:16:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 23:36:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 20:54:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 19:49:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:59:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:45:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 18:20:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:51:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:38:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:29:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:14:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 17:13:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 20:45:16 -0600 Rating Details