Birdwatch Note
2023-11-25 12:41:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
De term "wit" om blanke mensen aan te duiden wordt door een grote meerderheid als racistische ervaren. Tegenover 'mensen met kleur' staan de 'mensen zonder kleur', de 'witten'. Het woord 'wit' is helemaal niet ‘neutraal’, maar "het is een vorm van ideologische vernedering. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_en_wit_in_het_racismedebat
Written by 2968E193D749530701F63A42ED4602D212174FEC80AA96239466C369928FB912
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1728306447828574544
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1728393491518996842
- noteId - 1728393491518996842
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2968E193D749530701F63A42ED4602D212174FEC80AA96239466C369928FB912 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700916095034
- tweetId - 1728306447828574544
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- De term "wit" om blanke mensen aan te duiden wordt door een grote meerderheid als racistische ervaren. Tegenover 'mensen met kleur' staan de 'mensen zonder kleur', de 'witten'. Het woord 'wit' is helemaal niet ‘neutraal’, maar "het is een vorm van ideologische vernedering. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_en_wit_in_het_racismedebat
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-25 12:41:35 UTC (1700916095034) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-26 03:30:36 UTC (1700969436505) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-25 17:40:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 17:30:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 15:57:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 15:28:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 13:26:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:08:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 11:31:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 11:16:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 10:35:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 10:32:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:51:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:20:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 08:59:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:35:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:34:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:23:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 06:47:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-26 04:17:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-26 00:02:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-26 06:29:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 15:29:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 14:07:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 13:35:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 13:12:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:21:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 12:13:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 09:15:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 08:05:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:51:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:23:29 -0600 | Rating Details |