Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-25 03:30:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In addition to the line being an extremely poor fit.it makes little sense to interpret the supposed association as causal, given that each point represents a different industry. Are we to believe that the key driver of tech industry growth is the migrants, not demand for tech?

Written by 42A36B61AF70A036AD25EC1F2F5E5663DA9344F73A2B2176BA7C9BAA7983B656
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1727623886131311024

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1728254764369187116
  • noteId - 1728254764369187116
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 42A36B61AF70A036AD25EC1F2F5E5663DA9344F73A2B2176BA7C9BAA7983B656 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700883019903
  • tweetId - 1727623886131311024
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • In addition to the line being an extremely poor fit.it makes little sense to interpret the supposed association as causal, given that each point represents a different industry. Are we to believe that the key driver of tech industry growth is the migrants, not demand for tech?

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-25 03:30:19 UTC
(1700883019903)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-26 03:30:36 UTC
(1700969436505)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-25 10:39:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 09:15:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 08:45:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 07:21:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 03:13:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 02:05:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 01:43:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-26 10:29:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 16:16:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 03:48:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 02:54:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 01:46:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-24 21:33:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 07:51:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-15 16:17:13 -0600 Rating Details