Birdwatch Note
2023-11-25 00:24:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Despite author's claim, the majority of the colonizers or settlers are civilians. Settlers, like any other civilians, cannot be targeted and only lose their protection from attack if and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities, per the Fourth Geneva Convention https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/amnesty-international-breach-principle-distinction
Written by BA3A4033B1BB3D30E0C5E3D7D5521D0BFED4E425B705D808937A43710BA0EB2F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1727789314560663806
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1728207896117121107
- noteId - 1728207896117121107
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BA3A4033B1BB3D30E0C5E3D7D5521D0BFED4E425B705D808937A43710BA0EB2F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700871845641
- tweetId - 1727789314560663806
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Despite author's claim, the majority of the colonizers or settlers are civilians. Settlers, like any other civilians, cannot be targeted and only lose their protection from attack if and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities, per the Fourth Geneva Convention https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/amnesty-international-breach-principle-distinction
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-25 00:24:05 UTC (1700871845641) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-25 04:30:11 UTC (1700886611750) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-24 18:35:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-24 18:26:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-24 18:26:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 16:09:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 10:07:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 18:40:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 08:31:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 06:58:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 06:49:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-24 21:47:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 07:11:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 06:44:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-25 04:42:55 -0600 | Rating Details |