Birdwatch Note
2023-11-24 11:53:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claiming a car's fuel efficiency can jump from 30% to 100% with a DIY "hydrogen on demand" system is scientifically implausible. Electrolysis isn't 100% efficient, and 100% fuel burn efficiency defies thermodynamics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_conversion_efficiency
Written by 167F642EE4C8F53336E4B40DF5BB972B8B91E1D5DE861E4900D7DA07370F015A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1727740711221756222
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1728018914381087089
- noteId - 1728018914381087089
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 167F642EE4C8F53336E4B40DF5BB972B8B91E1D5DE861E4900D7DA07370F015A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700826788880
- tweetId - 1727740711221756222
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claiming a car's fuel efficiency can jump from 30% to 100% with a DIY "hydrogen on demand" system is scientifically implausible. Electrolysis isn't 100% efficient, and 100% fuel burn efficiency defies thermodynamics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_conversion_efficiency
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-24 11:53:08 UTC (1700826788880) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-25 04:30:11 UTC (1700886611750) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-24 11:08:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 10:52:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 10:34:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 10:17:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 09:51:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 09:38:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 05:58:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 11:18:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 11:06:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 10:03:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 09:57:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 09:53:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:59:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:59:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:56:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:44:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:13:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 08:11:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 07:24:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 07:08:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 06:17:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 06:14:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-24 06:39:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-18 01:03:32 -0600 | Rating Details |