Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-21 06:52:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

既にファクトチェック済みのデマです。 https://note.com/osamu_iga/n/n76735f6e16ca?sub_rt=share_pw ｜@osamu_iga 流産率80%超というデマは、以下の論文の数値を誤読して生み出したもの。 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 105446例の妊娠、内13160例の自然流産を用いて、流産前28日間のmRNAワクチン接種を、対照群（妊娠継続中）と比較。流産と28日以内の接種歴に関連なし。調整オッズ比 1.02; 95% CI 0.96-1.08｜米国 Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784193?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=081023

Written by 8C120F8B617DBAC9E4696DE6F24E78952C3CAB0AAA8B11A719AE451FCC3B40DD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1726432073525965293

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1726856202108498054
  • noteId - 1726856202108498054
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8C120F8B617DBAC9E4696DE6F24E78952C3CAB0AAA8B11A719AE451FCC3B40DD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700549576677
  • tweetId - 1726432073525965293
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 既にファクトチェック済みのデマです。 https://note.com/osamu_iga/n/n76735f6e16ca?sub_rt=share_pw ｜@osamu_iga 流産率80%超というデマは、以下の論文の数値を誤読して生み出したもの。 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 105446例の妊娠、内13160例の自然流産を用いて、流産前28日間のmRNAワクチン接種を、対照群（妊娠継続中）と比較。流産と28日以内の接種歴に関連なし。調整オッズ比 1.02; 95% CI 0.96-1.08｜米国 Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784193?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=081023

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-21 06:52:56 UTC
(1700549576677)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-11-22 03:07:15 UTC
(1700622435922)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)