Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-20 17:10:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Vid has more variety of views, but note that the men are against and the women are in support of homosexuality. Women in Palestine are still inequal to men, live under patriarchy so their opinions likely go ignored overall. The OP this replies to is likely more representative. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01591-4

Written by A8F657D87DBC3056BAC6C2F74E870B80E19AB9BEB39E200633D9B5F2C14ED762
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1726635198417436723

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1726649290985030022
  • noteId - 1726649290985030022
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A8F657D87DBC3056BAC6C2F74E870B80E19AB9BEB39E200633D9B5F2C14ED762 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700500245222
  • tweetId - 1726635198417436723
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Vid has more variety of views, but note that the men are against and the women are in support of homosexuality. Women in Palestine are still inequal to men, live under patriarchy so their opinions likely go ignored overall. The OP this replies to is likely more representative. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01591-4

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-20 17:10:45 UTC
(1700500245222)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-21 04:11:11 UTC
(1700539871995)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-20 12:58:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 11:46:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 11:17:40 -0600 Rating Details