Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-19 19:28:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The latest analysis shows that it was actually an Israeli military helicopter that fired on the concert. (Probably a mistake, they certainly didn't have orders in that sense) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/11/17/video-shows-israeli-military-fighting-with-hamas-fact-check/71608669007/

Written by 73ECFB957FDBAFAA5C6441525AF7E0AA62772CAC2187C7D9936878D4A5F1CCAA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1726287151875199321

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1726321481137664503
  • noteId - 1726321481137664503
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 73ECFB957FDBAFAA5C6441525AF7E0AA62772CAC2187C7D9936878D4A5F1CCAA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700422089263
  • tweetId - 1726287151875199321
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The latest analysis shows that it was actually an Israeli military helicopter that fired on the concert. (Probably a mistake, they certainly didn't have orders in that sense) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/11/17/video-shows-israeli-military-fighting-with-hamas-fact-check/71608669007/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-19 19:28:09 UTC
(1700422089263)
2023-11-19 21:43:13 UTC
(1700430193266)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-20 02:51:06 UTC
(1700448666702)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-19 21:43:13 UTC
(1700430193266)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-19 18:26:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 15:37:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 15:16:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 15:05:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:19:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:15:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:15:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:07:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:03:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:02:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:59:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:52:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:49:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:44:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:34:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 21:54:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 03:05:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 23:00:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 15:09:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:43:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:35:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:32:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:00:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:53:13 -0600 Rating Details