Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-19 13:45:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

While this is correct, SpaceX is utilising an iterative design process in which failure is expected. They already demonstrated how effective this can be with their falcon 9 program https://youtu.be/bvim4rsNHkQ?si=kW8ksso8mx3oUjSH

Written by 8E7E7D495CA2FE32B1F98141E5DE78A03E7258BA76BEEE0CA01AE9A9C8FA4A33
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1725901253647933524

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1726235260407448012
  • noteId - 1726235260407448012
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E7E7D495CA2FE32B1F98141E5DE78A03E7258BA76BEEE0CA01AE9A9C8FA4A33 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700401532637
  • tweetId - 1725901253647933524
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • While this is correct, SpaceX is utilising an iterative design process in which failure is expected. They already demonstrated how effective this can be with their falcon 9 program https://youtu.be/bvim4rsNHkQ?si=kW8ksso8mx3oUjSH

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-19 13:45:32 UTC
(1700401532637)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-20 02:51:06 UTC
(1700448666702)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-19 14:47:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 14:34:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 13:41:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 11:27:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:46:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:04:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 02:03:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 21:23:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 20:19:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 19:51:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 18:15:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 16:02:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 15:02:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 10:25:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:56:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:35:22 -0600 Rating Details