Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-17 09:41:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Il fallait une majorité de votes "contre" pour refuser le prolongement. Si ceux qui se sont abstenus avaient voté "contre", la prolongation du glyphosate pour 10 ans aurait été rejetée. Ainsi, il est incorrect de prétendre qu'une abstention vaut vote "contre". https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/environnement/ue-scandaleux-erreur-monumentale-les-reactions-apres-le-renouvellement-de-l-autorisation-du-glyphosate-2985965

Written by 81F166666EEED74820E622C676940C2E620E6C3A68A5CB2D952027461E0E2FFF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1725415664725246283

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725449011786612896
  • noteId - 1725449011786612896
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 81F166666EEED74820E622C676940C2E620E6C3A68A5CB2D952027461E0E2FFF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700214076353
  • tweetId - 1725415664725246283
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Il fallait une majorité de votes "contre" pour refuser le prolongement. Si ceux qui se sont abstenus avaient voté "contre", la prolongation du glyphosate pour 10 ans aurait été rejetée. Ainsi, il est incorrect de prétendre qu'une abstention vaut vote "contre". https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/environnement/ue-scandaleux-erreur-monumentale-les-reactions-apres-le-renouvellement-de-l-autorisation-du-glyphosate-2985965

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-17 09:41:16 UTC
(1700214076353)
2023-11-17 14:43:55 UTC
(1700232235147)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-18 02:43:45 UTC
(1700275425583)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-17 14:43:55 UTC
(1700232235147)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-17 17:28:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 17:27:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 17:14:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 12:44:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 11:32:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 11:27:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:52:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:42:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:15:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:09:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 08:14:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 05:03:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 04:24:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 04:15:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 03:49:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 06:18:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 04:20:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 03:34:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 02:00:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 01:55:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 00:57:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 00:41:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 00:07:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 10:20:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 01:53:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 19:32:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:10:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 14:08:24 -0600 Rating Details