Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-17 08:26:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Vitamin k is recommended for newborns as they are not able to absorb enough orally to be effective. The article attached provides context on why it’s important https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/149/3/e2021056036/184866/Vitamin-K-and-the-Newborn-Infant?autologincheck=redirected

Written by F5292068E312763B4370CE8E30D99BFBBFC9CDECC7C7564C3A4EF6A611EC7006
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1725333837222203517

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725430249674949094
  • noteId - 1725430249674949094
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F5292068E312763B4370CE8E30D99BFBBFC9CDECC7C7564C3A4EF6A611EC7006 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700209603120
  • tweetId - 1725333837222203517
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Vitamin k is recommended for newborns as they are not able to absorb enough orally to be effective. The article attached provides context on why it’s important https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/149/3/e2021056036/184866/Vitamin-K-and-the-Newborn-Infant?autologincheck=redirected

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-17 08:26:43 UTC
(1700209603120)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-18 02:43:45 UTC
(1700275425583)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-17 15:23:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 11:28:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 11:13:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 10:17:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:36:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:28:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 09:00:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 08:27:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 08:15:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 06:50:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 06:41:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 06:37:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 06:37:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 06:10:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 05:41:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 04:08:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 02:54:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 00:07:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 19:53:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 21:31:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 23:35:10 -0600 Rating Details