Birdwatch Note
2023-11-17 00:13:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
One of the plaintiff's defamation claims was dismissed for failing to prove each essential element of defamation, not for a lack of testimony. A prima facie case was established for one of the statements. A court still needs to determine if it is actual defamation or not. https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/civil/civil_juries.html#:~:text=As%20to%20defamation%20cases%2C%20s,unless%20the%20court%20otherwise%20orders.
Written by FD2D571EC6A2ACB6383A39426CD0083DB18D3EA515895F821833C90699E98497
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1725278014756544762
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1725306104337637480
- noteId - 1725306104337637480
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FD2D571EC6A2ACB6383A39426CD0083DB18D3EA515895F821833C90699E98497 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700180004567
- tweetId - 1725278014756544762
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- One of the plaintiff's defamation claims was dismissed for failing to prove each essential element of defamation, not for a lack of testimony. A prima facie case was established for one of the statements. A court still needs to determine if it is actual defamation or not. https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/civil/civil_juries.html#:~:text=As%20to%20defamation%20cases%2C%20s,unless%20the%20court%20otherwise%20orders.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-17 00:13:24 UTC (1700180004567) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-17 03:07:47 UTC (1700190467464) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-16 18:23:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-17 03:51:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 20:43:09 -0600 | Rating Details |