Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-16 20:02:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is an illegal counterfeit, even if acknowledged as a "replica"; "Rolex" and the associated logo is a protected trademark which can't legally be reproduced without permission. If you buy this it is liable to be seized en route and destroyed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit_watch https://www.forbes.com/sites/arieladams/2013/05/30/the-truth-about-replica-watches/amp/ https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2023-06-23/fake-prada-rolex-and-chanel-among-thousands-of-counterfeit-goods-found-in-shops https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/cbp-jfk-seizes-counterfeit-rolex-watches

Written by 03A6D5C493364ABC6DF34F56FD9006A9CFB7FEA6C21513564043DFDAA5E0AC15
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1725148877643280660

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725242851720626282
  • noteId - 1725242851720626282
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 03A6D5C493364ABC6DF34F56FD9006A9CFB7FEA6C21513564043DFDAA5E0AC15 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700164923969
  • tweetId - 1725148877643280660
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is an illegal counterfeit, even if acknowledged as a "replica"; "Rolex" and the associated logo is a protected trademark which can't legally be reproduced without permission. If you buy this it is liable to be seized en route and destroyed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit_watch https://www.forbes.com/sites/arieladams/2013/05/30/the-truth-about-replica-watches/amp/ https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2023-06-23/fake-prada-rolex-and-chanel-among-thousands-of-counterfeit-goods-found-in-shops https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/cbp-jfk-seizes-counterfeit-rolex-watches

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-16 20:02:03 UTC
(1700164923969)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-17 03:07:47 UTC
(1700190467464)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-16 14:51:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 14:19:31 -0600 Rating Details