Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-16 16:23:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Note necessary, Corbyn did not say the vote would give a voice to the Palestinian people, but that MPs who voted against, ignored their voices. The capability of the vote is important information in the reality of the situation. The note does not invalidate Corbyn’s opinion. https://t.co/x436K571Y5.

Written by 86B290EC45B2EE9795136707294F7DF6939D0781B7BF9E8111F163E4D0CE3030
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724872316645945480

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725187731674796438
  • noteId - 1725187731674796438
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 86B290EC45B2EE9795136707294F7DF6939D0781B7BF9E8111F163E4D0CE3030 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700151782328
  • tweetId - 1724872316645945480
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Note necessary, Corbyn did not say the vote would give a voice to the Palestinian people, but that MPs who voted against, ignored their voices. The capability of the vote is important information in the reality of the situation. The note does not invalidate Corbyn’s opinion. https://t.co/x436K571Y5.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-16 16:23:02 UTC
(1700151782328)
2023-11-16 21:04:40 UTC
(1700168680820)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-17 03:07:47 UTC
(1700190467464)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-16 21:04:40 UTC
(1700168680820)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-16 14:04:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 13:51:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 13:50:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 13:09:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 13:08:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 11:05:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 11:04:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:58:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:51:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:42:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:26:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 02:20:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 11:00:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-24 09:22:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-19 22:41:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 14:40:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-14 03:02:34 -0600 Rating Details