Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-16 11:51:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The capitol police tweet just says an officer was pepper sprayed, not that a protestor sprayed them, Officers are commonly affected when it is Police deploying pepper spray. See 2nd bullet point: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/pepper-spray-research-insights-effects-and-effectiveness-have-curbed-its-appeal

Written by 990501E968A2A9CD606FEEEBD1C0FEAABD4020E7689BF7062DD56045326187B7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724977186916991243

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725119404797464664
  • noteId - 1725119404797464664
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 990501E968A2A9CD606FEEEBD1C0FEAABD4020E7689BF7062DD56045326187B7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700135491932
  • tweetId - 1724977186916991243
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. The capitol police tweet just says an officer was pepper sprayed, not that a protestor sprayed them, Officers are commonly affected when it is Police deploying pepper spray. See 2nd bullet point: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/pepper-spray-research-insights-effects-and-effectiveness-have-curbed-its-appeal

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-16 11:51:31 UTC
(1700135491932)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-17 03:07:47 UTC
(1700190467464)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-16 18:25:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 17:38:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 15:15:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 12:49:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 11:28:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 11:18:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:35:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 09:45:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 09:14:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 09:00:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:42:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:38:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:35:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:10:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:05:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:44:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:43:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:15:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 06:24:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-17 10:20:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 19:24:38 -0600 Rating Details