Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-16 05:23:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The passive voice is key in the referenced tweet: "being pepper sprayed" doesn't identify who is doing the pepper spraying. This could quite possibly be friendly fire from another officer. There's too much ambiguity to justify a CN here. https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1725009429060284705?s=61&t=AxHFWbLpYmWuCjWHNKNU9A

Written by 0EFDFF17726E72914D612C286940CE34DC38B66A2739CFDEFA757A7A72ED777F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724999069335003174

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1725021654214975928
  • noteId - 1725021654214975928
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0EFDFF17726E72914D612C286940CE34DC38B66A2739CFDEFA757A7A72ED777F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700112186372
  • tweetId - 1724999069335003174
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The passive voice is key in the referenced tweet: "being pepper sprayed" doesn't identify who is doing the pepper spraying. This could quite possibly be friendly fire from another officer. There's too much ambiguity to justify a CN here. https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1725009429060284705?s=61&t=AxHFWbLpYmWuCjWHNKNU9A

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-16 05:23:06 UTC
(1700112186372)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-17 03:07:47 UTC
(1700190467464)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-16 15:15:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 11:15:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:35:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:31:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:12:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:06:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 08:02:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:51:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:49:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 02:07:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:47:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 00:46:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 00:39:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 00:32:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 00:23:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 00:01:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 23:53:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 23:45:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 23:36:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 19:12:57 -0600 Rating Details