Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-15 19:13:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

‪This is definitely not 100 years ago as the post claims (which would make it 1923). Just look at the design of the pram, the bike, and the woman’s hair and clothing style. A quick internet search gave this YouTube video claiming it is from 1951, which seems way more likely: https://youtu.be/zp0f-COD4tc?si=89KqBNe7CreasXV2‬

Written by DD31F63E56E32E79B71C2E8E2BD0AE502FB53C1716D1D5D4CFC035E149659C99
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724847287371723127

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724868226394267697
  • noteId - 1724868226394267697
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DD31F63E56E32E79B71C2E8E2BD0AE502FB53C1716D1D5D4CFC035E149659C99 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700075606333
  • tweetId - 1724847287371723127
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • ‪This is definitely not 100 years ago as the post claims (which would make it 1923). Just look at the design of the pram, the bike, and the woman’s hair and clothing style. A quick internet search gave this YouTube video claiming it is from 1951, which seems way more likely: https://youtu.be/zp0f-COD4tc?si=89KqBNe7CreasXV2‬

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-15 19:13:26 UTC
(1700075606333)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC
(1700104087450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-15 17:48:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 16:07:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:35:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:31:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:23:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:13:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:56:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:14:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 10:24:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 09:43:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 09:15:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 07:21:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 06:39:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 06:24:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 04:02:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 03:07:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 02:56:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:52:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:07:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 23:58:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 23:39:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 21:58:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 21:12:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 21:07:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 20:59:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 20:37:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 20:36:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 10:03:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 12:25:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 00:36:09 -0600 Rating Details