Birdwatch Note
2023-11-15 17:58:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Im Falle von Nius/Julius Böhm wurde die Ablehnung von Bündnis 90/Die Grünen nicht begründet oder kommentiert. Der DJV spricht hier vom ersten Fall einer "inhaltlichen Begründung". Dazu handelt es sich um die persönliche Meinung eines Verbands, eine CM ist daher nicht nötig.
Written by 94007B0C70002C9F9F987D2C1C37393B447DEAE36A1FA921C405E8056EE40676
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724789827496038582
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1724849438252826991
- noteId - 1724849438252826991
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 94007B0C70002C9F9F987D2C1C37393B447DEAE36A1FA921C405E8056EE40676 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700071126881
- tweetId - 1724789827496038582
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Im Falle von Nius/Julius Böhm wurde die Ablehnung von Bündnis 90/Die Grünen nicht begründet oder kommentiert. Der DJV spricht hier vom ersten Fall einer "inhaltlichen Begründung". Dazu handelt es sich um die persönliche Meinung eines Verbands, eine CM ist daher nicht nötig.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-15 17:58:46 UTC (1700071126881) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC (1700104087450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-15 16:49:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 16:47:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 16:21:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 15:09:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 14:24:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 14:22:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 14:20:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 14:14:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 13:59:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 13:57:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 12:57:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 12:41:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 12:03:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 02:01:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 01:22:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 01:06:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 00:26:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 00:19:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 00:07:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 23:54:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 23:10:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 22:28:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 22:18:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 22:15:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-15 19:34:22 -0600 | Rating Details |