Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-15 12:51:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Op basis van de data is dit een correcte tweet. Van alle partijen zien ze het liefst Timmermans al premier—voor deze claim hoeft er maar 1 persoon dat meer te zeggen dat de twee na liefste, 51% is totaal niet relevant. De populatie is ook ruim voldoende en representatief.

Written by 085242416D692622A428514C29BD8D71DE1A55F877718B8F9EEC1584E57525E9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724664644587884597

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724772043600605439
  • noteId - 1724772043600605439
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 085242416D692622A428514C29BD8D71DE1A55F877718B8F9EEC1584E57525E9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700052674564
  • tweetId - 1724664644587884597
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Op basis van de data is dit een correcte tweet. Van alle partijen zien ze het liefst Timmermans al premier—voor deze claim hoeft er maar 1 persoon dat meer te zeggen dat de twee na liefste, 51% is totaal niet relevant. De populatie is ook ruim voldoende en representatief.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-15 12:51:14 UTC
(1700052674564)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC
(1700104087450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-15 16:57:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 16:36:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 16:16:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 16:05:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 15:57:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 15:15:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 15:12:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:45:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:32:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:19:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:12:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:11:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 14:00:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:44:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:35:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:18:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:06:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:38:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:35:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:24:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 11:35:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 11:03:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:42:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 09:39:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 09:13:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 08:36:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 08:26:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:58:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:52:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:33:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:06:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:06:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 06:55:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 06:54:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:57:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:10:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-16 01:10:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 19:00:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 10:33:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-12 05:51:32 -0600 Rating Details