Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-15 08:04:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. It is true that the specific protection for hospitals does not apply when they are used for military purposes, but the absolute protection for civilians, and the law of armed conflict concepts of proportionality, distinction, and humanity are absolute. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/law1_final.pdf

Written by CE0977496729DDB7615D31E0192FA3F58EF8D2B9B239698064C465EEEBDAA3EB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724550894383993222

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724699972543652155
  • noteId - 1724699972543652155
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CE0977496729DDB7615D31E0192FA3F58EF8D2B9B239698064C465EEEBDAA3EB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1700035491489
  • tweetId - 1724550894383993222
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. It is true that the specific protection for hospitals does not apply when they are used for military purposes, but the absolute protection for civilians, and the law of armed conflict concepts of proportionality, distinction, and humanity are absolute. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/law1_final.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-15 08:04:51 UTC
(1700035491489)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC
(1700104087450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-15 16:07:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 15:41:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:46:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 13:36:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:27:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 12:15:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 11:42:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 11:36:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:39:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:22:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:20:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:19:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:19:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 09:33:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 09:23:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:54:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 07:46:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 05:24:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 04:40:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 03:58:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 03:51:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 03:22:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 03:13:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 02:41:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 02:23:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 02:09:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 02:06:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 22:15:40 -0600 Rating Details