Birdwatch Note
2023-11-15 01:50:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, in no way did Yong Yea say that he is the reason for the "Overwhelmingly Positive" rating.
Written by B67A4D64E26EA1C16B71E1AA73C46D881E2FB01F378F3BB2A25B4F162431CAD1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1722800152979935364
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1724605839107903800
- noteId - 1724605839107903800
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B67A4D64E26EA1C16B71E1AA73C46D881E2FB01F378F3BB2A25B4F162431CAD1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1700013048331
- tweetId - 1722800152979935364
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, in no way did Yong Yea say that he is the reason for the "Overwhelmingly Positive" rating.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-15 01:50:48 UTC (1700013048331) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-16 03:08:07 UTC (1700104087450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-14 20:26:02 -0600 | Rating Details |