Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-14 09:03:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Nicht Bayern generell baut schneller aus, sondern ausschließlich die beiden bayerischen Städte Ingolstadt und Regensburg. Bayern landet beim Bestand auf Platz 7 und ist somit bei weitem nicht führend. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/ingolstadt-e-auto-ladepunkt-spitzenreiter-1.6302440

Written by BD3DEE3C212FF7AEFB02151425E6B84FD313C929E2618EF1B90ADCAA6D1D7957
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724175713916293134

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724352251341221951
  • noteId - 1724352251341221951
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BD3DEE3C212FF7AEFB02151425E6B84FD313C929E2618EF1B90ADCAA6D1D7957 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699952588288
  • tweetId - 1724175713916293134
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Nicht Bayern generell baut schneller aus, sondern ausschließlich die beiden bayerischen Städte Ingolstadt und Regensburg. Bayern landet beim Bestand auf Platz 7 und ist somit bei weitem nicht führend. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/ingolstadt-e-auto-ladepunkt-spitzenreiter-1.6302440

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-14 09:03:08 UTC
(1699952588288)
2023-11-14 17:12:47 UTC
(1699981967826)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-15 03:09:33 UTC
(1700017773302)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-14 17:12:47 UTC
(1699981967826)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-14 16:06:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 11:33:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 11:26:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 11:07:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 10:54:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 10:18:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 09:53:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 09:45:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 09:34:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 08:26:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 07:48:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 07:21:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 06:15:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 03:40:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 03:15:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 03:13:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 23:44:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 18:53:14 -0600 Rating Details