Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-14 06:44:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As a lawyer, this is considered hyperbole and hearsay evidence without substantiation. The RCMP can actually be charged for profiling under racism bidirectionally if this would be deemed factual. As a lawyer, he should know better. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasir_Naqvi

Written by A2F21E0E53E6F61DDD8E31903B5F2665D891B63205760517F2254C4E218F60C8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723845718362730975

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1724317454476980531
  • noteId - 1724317454476980531
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A2F21E0E53E6F61DDD8E31903B5F2665D891B63205760517F2254C4E218F60C8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699944292073
  • tweetId - 1723845718362730975
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As a lawyer, this is considered hyperbole and hearsay evidence without substantiation. The RCMP can actually be charged for profiling under racism bidirectionally if this would be deemed factual. As a lawyer, he should know better. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasir_Naqvi

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-14 06:44:52 UTC
(1699944292073)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-15 03:09:33 UTC
(1700017773302)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-14 17:50:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 16:54:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 14:04:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 12:33:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 12:31:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 11:33:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 10:36:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 10:11:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 10:08:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 06:53:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 06:50:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 05:46:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 02:26:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 22:18:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 22:52:38 -0600 Rating Details