Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-12 16:41:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NICE spent around 4 years looking at the latest scientific research on M.E/C.F.S and listened to patients and advocacy groups who had been harmed by GET and CBT. GET and CBT for M.E/C.F.S were the result of a research study (PACE trial) that has been debunked as poor research https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141828/

Written by 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723656911701037077

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1723742756407754779
  • noteId - 1723742756407754779
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0B3A25A160F5CD87C436C627B1490B6679ADBF937CCDA1C7D906A7BE24E4D935 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699807273377
  • tweetId - 1723656911701037077
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NICE spent around 4 years looking at the latest scientific research on M.E/C.F.S and listened to patients and advocacy groups who had been harmed by GET and CBT. GET and CBT for M.E/C.F.S were the result of a research study (PACE trial) that has been debunked as poor research https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141828/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-12 16:41:13 UTC
(1699807273377)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-13 02:43:37 UTC
(1699843417158)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-12 16:48:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 16:40:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 15:37:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 14:38:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 13:44:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 13:03:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 11:25:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 21:20:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 16:05:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 13:37:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 05:08:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 21:56:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 20:32:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 15:36:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-13 13:35:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-21 00:59:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-20 00:12:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 09:05:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 04:29:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-19 00:27:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 16:58:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 16:23:51 -0600 Rating Details