Birdwatch Note
2023-11-12 15:15:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Luton Utilised a low block tactic which allowed United to have more possession, chances, shots, xG, etc. United could have been seen to be bad/wasteful/lucky in the game https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11661/13003228/man-utd-1-0-luton-victor-lindelof-goal-seals-back-to-back-premier-league-wins-for-erik-ten-hags-side
Written by 47F269E1121437E82F4521B5E0D985864582A299C1652F3D9BC6DEE3F7A29BFD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723448009575571557
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1723721176592113907
- noteId - 1723721176592113907
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 47F269E1121437E82F4521B5E0D985864582A299C1652F3D9BC6DEE3F7A29BFD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699802128344
- tweetId - 1723448009575571557
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN Luton Utilised a low block tactic which allowed United to have more possession, chances, shots, xG, etc. United could have been seen to be bad/wasteful/lucky in the game https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11661/13003228/man-utd-1-0-luton-victor-lindelof-goal-seals-back-to-back-premier-league-wins-for-erik-ten-hags-side
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-12 15:15:28 UTC (1699802128344) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-13 02:43:37 UTC (1699843417158) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-12 17:16:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-12 15:07:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-12 12:17:26 -0600 | Rating Details |