Birdwatch Note
2023-11-11 23:22:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A range from 0.1 to 4 mG.are normal EMF levels above this range are not necessarily hazardous, but indicate EMF levels above what's typical background inside a home. Readings depend on type of reader quality vs cheaper model waving it around not a good test https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Departments-and-Agencies/DPH/dph/environmental_health/eoha/pdf/EMFFactSheet2008pdf.pdf https://www.ehs.iastate.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/manuals/emf.pdf
Written by A42C167241257DCC760DC573E140128AAE4AEB6DD5EB1F4D283B8E22E0C0AC63
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723430452881473763
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1723481375632965887
- noteId - 1723481375632965887
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A42C167241257DCC760DC573E140128AAE4AEB6DD5EB1F4D283B8E22E0C0AC63 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699744955345
- tweetId - 1723430452881473763
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A range from 0.1 to 4 mG.are normal EMF levels above this range are not necessarily hazardous, but indicate EMF levels above what's typical background inside a home. Readings depend on type of reader quality vs cheaper model waving it around not a good test https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Departments-and-Agencies/DPH/dph/environmental_health/eoha/pdf/EMFFactSheet2008pdf.pdf https://www.ehs.iastate.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/manuals/emf.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-11 23:22:35 UTC (1699744955345) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-12 02:53:33 UTC (1699757613044) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-11 17:40:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-12 07:01:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 20:46:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 19:13:25 -0600 | Rating Details |