Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-11 21:40:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

https://www.police.vic.gov.au/police-investigate-fire-caulfield-business NNN. There is no proof for the fire having a racially motivated background. The assumption pro-palestinian people started the riot because of this, is exactly that: An assumption without proof. Therefore the OG post is correct, no additional context needed.

Written by 75D636CD7BD33845FDF95EAA2AC2C15E89DE401B9E43BE1FE5854DC2CE8D9D5F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723244060075237808

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1723455674359681328
  • noteId - 1723455674359681328
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 75D636CD7BD33845FDF95EAA2AC2C15E89DE401B9E43BE1FE5854DC2CE8D9D5F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699738827688
  • tweetId - 1723244060075237808
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • https://www.police.vic.gov.au/police-investigate-fire-caulfield-business NNN. There is no proof for the fire having a racially motivated background. The assumption pro-palestinian people started the riot because of this, is exactly that: An assumption without proof. Therefore the OG post is correct, no additional context needed.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-11 21:40:27 UTC
(1699738827688)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-11-12 02:53:33 UTC
(1699757613044)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-11 18:25:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 17:31:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 17:29:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 17:22:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 17:09:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 16:43:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 16:05:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 15:53:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 15:43:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 17:27:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 14:28:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 10:46:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 10:42:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 09:17:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 09:13:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 08:45:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 08:40:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 07:39:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 07:08:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 06:23:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 06:18:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 04:59:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 03:50:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 02:05:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 00:52:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 00:37:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 00:36:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 23:46:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 23:13:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 23:05:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 20:52:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 20:44:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 20:12:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 19:14:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 15:38:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 20:01:30 -0600 Rating Details