Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-11 19:41:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Supreme Court says the government can't encourage private actors to do what it can't. The documents show that DHS-CISA worked with Stanford Internet Observatory to demand censorship and that the social media platforms acted upon those demands in violation of the 1st Amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/EIP_Jira_Ticket_Staff_Report_11-6-23_Clean.pdf

Written by 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721674461408006431

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1723425717671924058
  • noteId - 1723425717671924058
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5A89AFEDC85F8FF062FB5E44AD3373DF9BEA2775BD03455C714BE5ED05B09F9A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699731685453
  • tweetId - 1721674461408006431
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Supreme Court says the government can't encourage private actors to do what it can't. The documents show that DHS-CISA worked with Stanford Internet Observatory to demand censorship and that the social media platforms acted upon those demands in violation of the 1st Amendment. https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/EIP_Jira_Ticket_Staff_Report_11-6-23_Clean.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-11 19:41:25 UTC
(1699731685453)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-12 02:53:33 UTC
(1699757613044)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-11 14:23:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 14:09:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 00:07:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 21:10:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-13 09:12:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-13 07:08:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-12 23:55:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 11:53:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 16:19:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-14 21:17:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-24 09:42:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 15:35:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 10:04:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 08:47:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 08:09:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 01:27:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-29 05:29:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 14:21:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 13:14:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-24 10:48:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 06:28:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 01:24:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 16:23:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 07:52:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-25 15:55:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-25 18:01:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-25 16:12:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-25 15:42:17 -0500 Rating Details