Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-11 08:53:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The post takes for granted that COVID-19 virus was created in a lab, but this is only one of the hypotheses, many scientists hypothesizing a zoonotic origin. The origin is still unclear. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(23)00074-5/fulltext https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2305081

Written by 656651C247894B0433C4C0C718423E33CD4BB867254D49FD9818BAB721F78708
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1723176499661119918

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1723262698564030964
  • noteId - 1723262698564030964
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 656651C247894B0433C4C0C718423E33CD4BB867254D49FD9818BAB721F78708 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699692818667
  • tweetId - 1723176499661119918
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The post takes for granted that COVID-19 virus was created in a lab, but this is only one of the hypotheses, many scientists hypothesizing a zoonotic origin. The origin is still unclear. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(23)00074-5/fulltext https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2305081

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-11 08:53:38 UTC
(1699692818667)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-12 02:53:33 UTC
(1699757613044)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-11 10:26:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 09:12:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 07:19:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 06:58:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 06:33:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 06:24:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 06:16:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 05:34:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:53:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:52:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:42:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:20:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:15:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:13:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:11:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:03:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:00:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 04:00:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 03:18:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 03:00:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 02:59:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-11 21:21:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 10:19:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 11:21:32 -0600 Rating Details