Birdwatch Note
2023-11-10 04:03:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: The hostile language of the 1st CN would be a violation of X rules against harassment/abuse if approved: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/x-rules It’s also at least partially untrue since “investigative journalist” is defined by what they do & not education. E.g.: https://www.writersdigest.com/write-better-nonfiction/what-is-investigative-journalism https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/investigative-journalism Thus, the 1st CN is also fallacious: https://www.logicalfallacies.org/no-true-scotsman.html
Written by 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1722011349109084543
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1722827289333842037
- noteId - 1722827289333842037
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699589009017
- tweetId - 1722011349109084543
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN: The hostile language of the 1st CN would be a violation of X rules against harassment/abuse if approved: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/x-rules It’s also at least partially untrue since “investigative journalist” is defined by what they do & not education. E.g.: https://www.writersdigest.com/write-better-nonfiction/what-is-investigative-journalism https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/investigative-journalism Thus, the 1st CN is also fallacious: https://www.logicalfallacies.org/no-true-scotsman.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-10 04:03:29 UTC (1699589009017) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-11 03:16:55 UTC (1699672615357) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-10 04:03:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 22:06:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 05:44:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 03:07:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 23:52:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 20:07:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-25 08:31:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-05 10:32:05 -0600 | Rating Details |