Birdwatch Note
2023-11-09 16:37:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Nicki Minaj looks amazing on this VOGUE US photoshoot. However, she’s not the first female rapper in history to be the cover of the US Vogue Magazine. The Grammy winning artist Cardi B did it first - January/2020 issue. https://www.revolt.tv/article/2019-12-09/83295/cardi-b-becomes-first-female-rapper-to-cover-vogue/
Written by 8E88021DA3D93CCBDA9691F8FFB4E3A3C2FF070025766F3A1C92105340906C77
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1722609587067720103
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1722654564078211386
- noteId - 1722654564078211386
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E88021DA3D93CCBDA9691F8FFB4E3A3C2FF070025766F3A1C92105340906C77 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699547828103
- tweetId - 1722609587067720103
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Nicki Minaj looks amazing on this VOGUE US photoshoot. However, she’s not the first female rapper in history to be the cover of the US Vogue Magazine. The Grammy winning artist Cardi B did it first - January/2020 issue. https://www.revolt.tv/article/2019-12-09/83295/cardi-b-becomes-first-female-rapper-to-cover-vogue/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-09 16:37:08 UTC (1699547828103) |
2023-11-09 22:54:33 UTC (1699570473977) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-11-10 02:56:01 UTC (1699584961849) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-11-09 22:54:33 UTC (1699570473977) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-09 14:58:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 13:02:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 12:50:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 11:47:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 11:46:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 10:40:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 08:14:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 01:35:17 -0600 | Rating Details |