Birdwatch Note
2023-11-09 00:44:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. It’s pretty clearly the OPs opinion, debate it in the replies.
Written by 99B7073C5DD47CD6CD0E3525A3163DAE365445C2F86A2FB2C3CAC468BA545C85
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714629604483178777
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1722414846673662184
- noteId - 1722414846673662184
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 99B7073C5DD47CD6CD0E3525A3163DAE365445C2F86A2FB2C3CAC468BA545C85 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699490675029
- tweetId - 1714629604483178777
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. It’s pretty clearly the OPs opinion, debate it in the replies.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-09 00:44:35 UTC (1699490675029) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-09 02:51:28 UTC (1699498288349) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-08 18:46:14 -0600 | Rating Details |