Birdwatch Note
2023-11-07 20:01:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
M Dupont-Aignan parle de censure alors que l’article a été publié par un éditeur indépendant Elsevier dans « New Microbes and New Infections » Étonnamment il mélange politique et décision administrative et omet un fait scientifique majeur : l’hydroxychloroquine ne marche pas https://sfpt-fr.org/covid19-foire-aux-questions/1094-la-chloroquine-ou-l-hydroxychloroquine-sont-elles-efficaces-pour-prevenir-ou-traiter-l-infection-par-coronavirus
Written by DCAEC1ADD086484EB72AE05D5D515F442B06B2F2312CE2E550CB3E894B2DF71A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721929882152718336
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1721981193552351729
- noteId - 1721981193552351729
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DCAEC1ADD086484EB72AE05D5D515F442B06B2F2312CE2E550CB3E894B2DF71A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699387284064
- tweetId - 1721929882152718336
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- M Dupont-Aignan parle de censure alors que l’article a été publié par un éditeur indépendant Elsevier dans « New Microbes and New Infections » Étonnamment il mélange politique et décision administrative et omet un fait scientifique majeur : l’hydroxychloroquine ne marche pas https://sfpt-fr.org/covid19-foire-aux-questions/1094-la-chloroquine-ou-l-hydroxychloroquine-sont-elles-efficaces-pour-prevenir-ou-traiter-l-infection-par-coronavirus
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-07 20:01:24 UTC (1699387284064) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC (1699413561605) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-07 17:42:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 17:05:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 16:39:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 16:37:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 16:21:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 16:00:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 15:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 14:35:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 14:28:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 14:25:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 14:34:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 09:58:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 02:51:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 02:28:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 02:20:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 00:14:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 00:06:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-08 00:00:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-07 18:46:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 15:41:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 05:48:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 03:48:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 00:34:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 07:41:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 00:23:00 -0600 | Rating Details |