Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-07 18:27:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Este sindicaro tiene el 50% de los representantes. Sería más correcto "un sector importante de los sindicatos policiales" https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/seguridad/elecciones-consejo-policia-jupol-pierde-mitad-vocales-que-consiguio-hace-anos/20230629071951599011.html

Written by 33D7BCDF8C72515CAD6C3B3E57F313A6E9725062F2A9CF5D38F1A134E1298BDF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721839222548472197

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721957545827270973
  • noteId - 1721957545827270973
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 33D7BCDF8C72515CAD6C3B3E57F313A6E9725062F2A9CF5D38F1A134E1298BDF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699381646011
  • tweetId - 1721839222548472197
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Este sindicaro tiene el 50% de los representantes. Sería más correcto "un sector importante de los sindicatos policiales" https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/seguridad/elecciones-consejo-policia-jupol-pierde-mitad-vocales-que-consiguio-hace-anos/20230629071951599011.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-07 18:27:26 UTC
(1699381646011)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC
(1699413561605)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-07 17:30:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:22:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:52:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:47:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 00:05:18 -0600 Rating Details