Birdwatch Note
2023-11-07 18:26:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-08172021.pdf Page 5 in the second paragraph from the bottom : "Defendant was not a party in the UK action and was not treated as one. Because she was not a named defendant, she was not subject to the same discovery rules applicable to named parties." Judge Jeanine comments on the case https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dB0nAHCG-uQ
Written by C19A8B2CC5AA0CF34745421D1587EE6322FA8A07CD680F77468653C4AC653701
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721606360113029266
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1721957344802656555
- noteId - 1721957344802656555
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C19A8B2CC5AA0CF34745421D1587EE6322FA8A07CD680F77468653C4AC653701 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699381598081
- tweetId - 1721606360113029266
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-08172021.pdf Page 5 in the second paragraph from the bottom : "Defendant was not a party in the UK action and was not treated as one. Because she was not a named defendant, she was not subject to the same discovery rules applicable to named parties." Judge Jeanine comments on the case https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dB0nAHCG-uQ
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-07 18:26:38 UTC (1699381598081) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC (1699413561605) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-07 16:05:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 12:45:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 12:45:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 16:08:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 12:42:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 11:21:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 09:56:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 09:24:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-08 07:16:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-05-01 12:20:29 -0500 | Rating Details |