Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-07 18:26:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-08172021.pdf Page 5 in the second paragraph from the bottom : "Defendant was not a party in the UK action and was not treated as one. Because she was not a named defendant, she was not subject to the same discovery rules applicable to named parties." Judge Jeanine comments on the case https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dB0nAHCG-uQ

Written by C19A8B2CC5AA0CF34745421D1587EE6322FA8A07CD680F77468653C4AC653701
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721606360113029266

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721957344802656555
  • noteId - 1721957344802656555
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C19A8B2CC5AA0CF34745421D1587EE6322FA8A07CD680F77468653C4AC653701 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699381598081
  • tweetId - 1721606360113029266
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-08172021.pdf Page 5 in the second paragraph from the bottom : "Defendant was not a party in the UK action and was not treated as one. Because she was not a named defendant, she was not subject to the same discovery rules applicable to named parties." Judge Jeanine comments on the case https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dB0nAHCG-uQ

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-07 18:26:38 UTC
(1699381598081)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC
(1699413561605)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-07 16:05:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:45:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:45:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 16:08:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 12:42:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 11:21:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 09:56:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 09:24:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 07:16:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-05-01 12:20:29 -0500 Rating Details