Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-07 15:36:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Outre le fait que M Philippot se trompe sur le nombre de patients traités (30 000 c’est déjà suffisant …), cette étude maquillée en étude rétrospective est bien une étude prospective sans autorisation légale comme déjà évoqué par 16 sociétés savantes 🇫🇷 https://www.lequotidiendumedecin.fr/actus-medicales/recherche-science/le-plus-grand-essai-sauvage-seize-societes-savantes-reclament-des-sanctions-sur-les-pratiques-de

Written by DCAEC1ADD086484EB72AE05D5D515F442B06B2F2312CE2E550CB3E894B2DF71A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721884767115952182

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721914525539000554
  • noteId - 1721914525539000554
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DCAEC1ADD086484EB72AE05D5D515F442B06B2F2312CE2E550CB3E894B2DF71A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699371389173
  • tweetId - 1721884767115952182
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Outre le fait que M Philippot se trompe sur le nombre de patients traités (30 000 c’est déjà suffisant …), cette étude maquillée en étude rétrospective est bien une étude prospective sans autorisation légale comme déjà évoqué par 16 sociétés savantes 🇫🇷 https://www.lequotidiendumedecin.fr/actus-medicales/recherche-science/le-plus-grand-essai-sauvage-seize-societes-savantes-reclament-des-sanctions-sur-les-pratiques-de

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-07 15:36:29 UTC
(1699371389173)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC
(1699413561605)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-07 17:58:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 16:02:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 15:57:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 15:05:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:56:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:47:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:41:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:33:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:32:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:25:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:06:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 13:16:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 13:11:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:55:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:25:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:08:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 10:29:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 09:40:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 18:28:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 07:10:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 05:25:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 03:23:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 01:55:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 23:32:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-21 16:22:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-12 02:53:33 -0600 Rating Details