Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-07 14:59:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

First, our closest cousins are other Apes, not monkeys. We, as homo-sapiens, are also Apes, and our closest relatives are Chimpanzees, gorillas, and Bonobos. And the image above, "The March of Progress," is not meant to be an exact description of our evolutionary progress. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/sep/23/guardianweekly.guardianweekly12

Written by 9C5F34BA2427957666F7CBC890FA441A051DFD94BD0DE73CD41AB9A6873F5ABE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721556561041011065

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721905338977509719
  • noteId - 1721905338977509719
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9C5F34BA2427957666F7CBC890FA441A051DFD94BD0DE73CD41AB9A6873F5ABE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699369198924
  • tweetId - 1721556561041011065
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • First, our closest cousins are other Apes, not monkeys. We, as homo-sapiens, are also Apes, and our closest relatives are Chimpanzees, gorillas, and Bonobos. And the image above, "The March of Progress," is not meant to be an exact description of our evolutionary progress. https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/sep/23/guardianweekly.guardianweekly12

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-07 14:59:58 UTC
(1699369198924)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-08 03:19:21 UTC
(1699413561605)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-07 15:35:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 11:29:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 11:14:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 10:37:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 09:49:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 09:01:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 05:45:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 04:54:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 07:50:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 17:09:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 16:45:07 -0600 Rating Details