Birdwatch Note
2023-11-06 22:57:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Ange is expressing his opinion. Suggested note is useless. “IF we go down to five” Key word is “IF”. Very obviously stating his principle of always trying to win the game and not changing tactics. Doesn’t matter if the game would end before going down to 5, its hypothetical.
Written by 8C51CA21F177A09F691F42DC41E2EBDA55833540B7D056546D60C6254E8BC945
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721658338008576385
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1721663071360303541
- noteId - 1721663071360303541
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8C51CA21F177A09F691F42DC41E2EBDA55833540B7D056546D60C6254E8BC945 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699311437824
- tweetId - 1721658338008576385
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Ange is expressing his opinion. Suggested note is useless. “IF we go down to five” Key word is “IF”. Very obviously stating his principle of always trying to win the game and not changing tactics. Doesn’t matter if the game would end before going down to 5, its hypothetical.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-06 22:57:17 UTC (1699311437824) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-07 03:05:44 UTC (1699326344811) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-06 17:46:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:27:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:22:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:21:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:21:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:20:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:15:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:09:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:09:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:06:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:06:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:03:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:02:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:01:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:01:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:00:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 17:00:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 16:58:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 07:32:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 03:56:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 03:50:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 03:02:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 02:24:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 01:30:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 01:27:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 00:50:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 00:20:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 23:51:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 23:10:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 22:54:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 19:02:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 18:38:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 18:32:58 -0600 | Rating Details |