Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-06 19:27:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The headline included in this post is factually correct. This is a real headline by a major newspaper. This post makes no reference to whether the desire for unvaxxed sperm is warranted or not. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12699293/unvaccinated-sperm-shady-donors-Covid-shot.html

Written by CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721554905066881311

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721610280671605047
  • noteId - 1721610280671605047
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699298851537
  • tweetId - 1721554905066881311
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The headline included in this post is factually correct. This is a real headline by a major newspaper. This post makes no reference to whether the desire for unvaxxed sperm is warranted or not. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12699293/unvaccinated-sperm-shady-donors-Covid-shot.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-06 19:27:31 UTC
(1699298851537)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-07 03:05:44 UTC
(1699326344811)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-06 16:21:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:18:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 15:35:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 15:27:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 14:46:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 14:28:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 14:14:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 14:08:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 13:46:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 13:40:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 13:33:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 13:32:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 13:28:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 02:04:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 01:48:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 01:09:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 00:29:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 20:16:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 10:59:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 04:33:04 -0600 Rating Details